Open Standards NZ Co-signers

The undersigned have all agreed that the New Zealand government should create a level playing field for software by mandating that all software procurement, particularly of commercial-off-the-shelf software, only considers software complying with open standards that are vendor-neutral, royalty-free and unencumbered by patents.

Where no relevant open standard exists, the government should undertake to develop suitable open standards, building on those already available elsewhere.

The goal is for software suppliers to the NZ government to compete to meet government-specified open standards rather than competing to set their own proprietary standard as is currently common practise.

# Name Organisation Comment Submitted
1 Carl Geib 16 Jun 2020 13:41
2 Sam Bristow 17 Jan 2018 11:25
3 Loic Teixeira 22 Mar 2017 11:03
4 Richard McMillan 22 Mar 2017 09:38
5 Jonathan Garlick 22 Mar 2017 09:14
6 Eion Robb 8 Mar 2017 21:07
7 Stephen Harlow 28 Feb 2017 11:22
8 Lachlan Wimsett 11 Dec 2016 18:17
9 David Nind 21 Nov 2016 22:24
10 Steven Ellis In order for any Govt to maintain or reduce their IT costs it is critical that Open Standards are adopted or you continue to be locked into expensive proprietary approaches that carry a high end of life cost. 21 Nov 2016 13:08
11 Monica Corbett Whattam 11 Nov 2016 18:06
12 Brent Wood 9 Nov 2016 11:54
13 Danny Adair 2 Nov 2016 15:26
14 Robert Fromont 15 Aug 2016 04:58
15 Richard Law 4 Aug 2016 17:32
16 Michael Fincham 3 Aug 2016 13:47
17 Evan Fraser 3 Aug 2016 12:40
18 Fran Firman 14 Jul 2016 09:49
19 Chris Linwood 11 Jul 2016 15:18
20 Morgan Avery 23 Jun 2016 13:58
21 Alan Falloon 9 Jun 2016 16:55
22 Mike Cowie 8 Jun 2016 20:44
23 Eion Robb 8 Jun 2016 20:43
24 Robert Collins In ICT the ability to use Free/Libre/Open source is a big competitive edge, as demonstrated by many web companies revolutionising the world today. For NZ to reap those benefits, it is essential that suppliers are able to compete on a level playing field rather than being forced to work with private "standards" which are designed to advantage their owner, rather than being a commons. Case studies that come to mind: - the UK experience - The Australian tax office submission headaches - Cost if e.g. voter registration forms were microsoft office templates 3 Mar 2016 10:35
25 Blake Burgess 2 Mar 2016 19:53
26 Shaun McGirr Need success stories to capture attention of policy makers: agency A adopted a certain open standard and look at the good it did! 9 Dec 2015 09:52
27 Jim Cheetham 16 Nov 2015 09:03
28 Donald Johnston I have experienced problems in the past with my children's school requiring assignments to be submitted in Microsoft Office format which is a non-standard format. Parents should not have any need to purchase proprietary office software when there is very good free alternative software (e.g. Libre Office) which is completely standards compliant. 15 Nov 2015 22:03
29 Nicholas Phillips Alternatively, as a very minimum, include cost of migrating data away from any tendered solution in the assessed cost of implementation of that solution. 5 Sep 2015 11:43
30 Pikiora Wylie 16 Aug 2015 21:05
31 Imogen Grace 10 Aug 2015 12:21
32 Elena Kondrateva 6 Aug 2015 23:46
33 David Stewart 5 Aug 2015 06:20
34 Robin de Haan The New Zealand Government should commit to open standards and not be prepared to trade them away. 31 Jul 2015 21:40
35 Abhishek Reddy 31 Jul 2015 18:36
36 Jan Larres 29 Jul 2015 08:51
37 Adrian Croucher 27 Jul 2015 16:57
38 donald callum robertson 27 Jul 2015 09:40
39 Nigel Bovey 26 Jul 2015 20:58
40 Richard Dougherty 25 Jul 2015 23:05